Su-City Pictures East, LLC

Screenplay & Film Consulting By Susan Kouguell

Tag: Script Magazine

Susan Kouguell Interviews WICKED Editor Myron Kerstein

In this wide-ranging interview for Script Magazine Kerstein talks about his love of editing musicals, his collaborations with director Jon M. Chu, finding the emotion in scenes, and so much more. No doubt, Kerstein’s enthusiasm and passion for films is contagious.

Myron Kerstein, ACE, is an Oscar-nominated and ACE Eddie Award-winning film and TV editor, producer, and director. His credits include tick, tick…BOOM!, In the Heights, Crazy Rich AsiansGarden StateGirlsHouse of LiesLittle FockersNick and Nora’s Infinite Playlist. Kerstein made his directorial debut in Season 2 of the AppleTV+ drama Home Before Dark.

[L-R] Cynthia Erivo as Elphaba and Ariana Grande as Glinda in Wicked (2024).
[L-R] Cynthia Erivo as Elphaba and Ariana Grande as Glinda in Wicked (2024).Courtesy of Universal Pictures

Kouguell: You’ve edited several movie musicals, including In the Heights and tick tick…BOOM!. (I interviewed screenwriter Steven Levenson for this publication).

Do you have a background in music? What drew you to this genre?

Kerstein: I had a very loose background in music. As a teenager, I played drums and saxophone in bands. I always had a love for music. I remember as a kid watching the Wizard of Oz, of course. The Music Man had a big impression on me as a kid. As a teenager, I loved films like Grease and Purple Rain. I loved movies that had lots of music in them, as well as music videos in the 80s.

When I started getting into the film business, I gravitated to that genre, working on Camp and Hedwig and the Angry Inch as an assistant editor, Garden State, which had a big soundtrack, and Nick and Norah’s Infinite Playlist – all these films were training for me.

When I met Jon Chu he actually wanted to make a musical together. I was really excited because I had put out in the universe that I wanted to work as a sole editor and it came at the right time. Jon and I would say we’ve been training for this all our lives. The truth is, it really did sort of build over the course of 20 years.

Kouguell: Wicked parts one and two are the fifth and sixth projects you worked on with director Jon Chu. Tell me about your collaboration.

Kerstein: It’s been a bromance. I love him like a brother. We found instantaneous connections on how to make films and television. It’s like you’re a kid again having this childhood wonder approach to making things to put out in the world. And, to have a real message and joyful presence in the world.

On Crazy Rich Asians we started to understand each other as creative artists and how we approach things. That trust began quickly and built with that film and with In the Heights it kept building; we were raising each other’s bar. We did that on television as well. Television has a certain speed because of schedules, and you’re thinking on your feet.

It’s been a dream come true. Jon changed my life. In Wicked there are themes about how a person changes you for the good or how they have the handprint on your heart. And he really has. It’s been an incredible journey. I’m really excited that people are responding to this movie because it is all the culmination of the things we’ve done together and with his collaborators Alice Brooks and Chris Scott, it’s an amazing collaboration.

Kouguell: You immersed yourself in Wicked by reading early drafts of parts one and two of the screenplay, watched the stage production on Broadway several times, re-watched the 1939 version of The Wizard of Oz, and read Frank Baum’s source material. How did this influence and inform your editing choices while capturing the spirit of this project?

Kerstein: It’s all about feeling and emotion for me. When I finished the first script I literally cried. I never had a more visceral reaction in my life. And that was very similar to seeing the original stage production. I watched it with my six-year-old son and then rewatched it when Broadway opened again after the pandemic. It was like a rock show, like Beatlemania. What I knew is that in order for the films to work, the audience had to connect emotionally the way I was connecting emotionally to the source material. I was chasing that the entire time, I needed to make sure that whatever my choices were I was listening to my heart.

Myron Kerstein
Myron KersteinCourtesy Myron Kerstein

There were 250 hours of footage of the two movies. I took note of my emotions. It all goes back to how I responded to that source material, and how I can best tell the story dramatically.

Kouguell: The editing was seamless, moving from live-action to visual effects.

Kerstein: Our job as filmmakers is to have a steady grip on the audience, there’s a suspension of disbelief that shouldn’t stop. The second that happens you’ve lost them. Keeping that firm grip and letting the audience know that we have you takes a lot of work between finding the right pace, to letting things breathe, to letting the emotion feel earned by the performances and getting carried away and immersed in that experience.

Kouguell: There is so much thematically going on, as well as shifts and tones and various genres, yet I never felt like I had whiplash.

Kerstein: We’re throwing a lot at you, a lot of tones – comedy, drama, melodrama, action, and horror – but if we keep that firm grip on the storytelling and the emotion, we felt that the audience would go along for the ride.

Kouguell: The screenplay by Winnie Holzman, had the lyrics written into the pages.

Kerstein: It was very helpful because my approach with cutting musicals is not to treat lyrics any different than dialogue so that it feels seamless. The storytelling doesn’t just stop because the characters stop singing. It’s just another way for the characters to express themselves. It was really helpful for me to read along and listen to the Broadway soundtrack, and to read along to understand the storytelling. There’s a lot packed into the lyrics and vocals. Otherwise, I think you’re just like, OK the song starts here and we’ll see you on the other side. Working this way I had a real understanding about what these characters are talking about through these songs, and how it works dramatically in the scenes.

Kerstein: There were a few moments like when Elphaba was flying around that we got to steal another live vocal from another live take, but they’re all doing it live the entire time. They were 100 percent thoroughbred; they are the best singers on the planet.

It was just an abundance of riches having all this dialogue/vocal/singing mixed into one another.

Kouguell: There must have been some challenges cutting the live vocals.

Kerstein: Editing musicals is the hardest genre; nothing compares to cutting live vocals that are, by the way, not always on a musical grid. Jon likes to start and stop songs, and build up anticipation, and mess with audiences’ expectations within a song. He wants to keep it fresh for the audience. He wants to build dramatic moments like he did in “Defying Gravity” and chapter things sometimes to give it a sense of place and setting. It’s super challenging, it’s a lot of balls in the air. I’ll have multiple tracks of different vocals, live piano, instrumental tracks, click tracks. There are lots of things I’m keeping track of and at the same time, I want it to all disappear into whatever the dramatic scene is. 

And on top of that, there is VGX and world building, and CG goats and CG animals. Thank goodness I didn’t have a flying monkey singing too! And then none of this matters, you need to make sure that it all disappears and it becomes this wonderful cinematic experience, and it did.

Cynthia Erivo as Elphaba in Wicked (2024).
Cynthia Erivo as Elphaba in Wicked (2024).Courtesy of Universal Pictures

Kouguell: Let’s talk about the Ozdust ballroom scene.

Kerstein: This is the centerpiece of Wicked and if that didn’t build up the emotion – between Glinda and Elphaba – the loneliness, bullying, and trying to find power and struggling with how Elphaba’s going to someday connect to somebody else in the world, the rest of the movie wouldn’t work.

We had to be really bold in how we picked performances and how we constructed that sequence. Jon shot 9-10 long takes with Cynthia Erivo in the Ozdust ballroom all the way to the end of that scene. Every one of those takes made me cry when I watched the dailies. I had to find that same emotion when I was cutting that sequence and build it out. It had to feel earned otherwise you weren’t going to root for these characters.

Kouguell: Were you editing both parts 1 and 2 at the same time? How did this process work?

Kerstein: For a bit, I was editing both parts at once. They were shooting both films at the same time, it was like block shooting like television. So one day I would get scenes from film one and the next day it would be scenes from film two. At some point, I brought in another editor Tatiana S. Reigel who cut I, Tonya to help me sort through stuff for the second movie. Tatiana is amazing.

Kouguell: Yes she is! I interviewed her several years ago for this publication.

Kerstein: What I love about the two Wicked films, it gives us time to spend with these characters and feel the nuances of how people go through the world together. You can’t have it all happen in one movie; any pace or rhythm would have felt cheapened. I just think that you can’t have that if you stuffed it all into one movie; it would feel like one big musical montage.

Kouguell: I’m really looking forward to seeing the second Wicked film. One year is a long wait!

Kerstein: It’s the longest intermission in the world. It will be worth waiting for. 

Wicked is now out exclusively in Theaters. 

Trailer

Pulling the Curtain Back at Script Magazine with Editor-In-Chief Sadie Dean and Senior Contributing Editor Susan Kouguell

We each come from a unique position as filmmakers ourselves, which offers a shorthand, not to mention inspiration when interviewing screenwriters and filmmakers. They’re appreciative when we find nuances in their work that perhaps no one has commented on before and for us, it often gives us further insight into our own projects.

Pulling-The-Curtain-Back-at-ScriptMag-2024-Script
Canva

Susan: One of the most common questions that I get from my students and Su-City clients is the importance of going to film school. There is no one-size-fits-all answer; it depends on the types of films you want to make and your career goals.

After undergraduate school, I was a fellow at the Whitney Independent Study Program, which was a perfect match for my practice as an experimental filmmaker. Now decades later, many of us remain close. Having that community is invaluable.

You attended the American Film Institute in the screenwriting program. How was that experience?

Sadie: It’s a super intense program. You’re writing, producing, and just putting out work constantly. What’s so good about that program is that you are in this really great group of people who are fostering what you’re trying to do as a creative. You have all the support systems to make your projects, and if you fall down in terms of writing, they lift you back up in some way.

It’s all traditional narrative filmmaking and linear storytelling.

A lot of us came straight out of undergrad school and in our early 20s, and taking out an incredibly large loan, not realizing how that’s going to affect your future. You hope that you’re going to sell a big script and make it big, but that’s not the reality. Coming out of film school and not having that support system anymore is hard. You can’t just necessarily say, OK, I’m going to make this film, and I have these people and the money to do it, because the school’s basically giving it to you or giving it to you from your own tuition.

Sadie Dean
Sadie Dean

I think there is a benefit in going to a film school like that, because you’re going there not only to make movies and work on your voice as a storyteller, but you’re networking. The first day there I remember being told: ‘look to your left, look to your right, look in front of you, look behind you, you’re paying for your network, you don’t know if the person is going to be your agent, or your producer, or your director.’

You’re building that film tribe. You never know who they’re going to know and put you in touch with. But then after the program is over, there’s that feeling of where I find my people again. Some are smart and go in different directions.

Susan: Define smart.

Sadie: They’re not ‘just’ screenwriters. I feel like if you’re going into this business, and you want a career after film school, become an editor or cinematographer because there’s a lot more work there and not as much for a first-time screenwriter out the gate. Unfortunately, I wish there was.

There is just more accessibility, I think especially for editors. I know a lot of editors who say, ‘Yes, I’m on a reality show, but I’m paying my bills.’ They’re networking with other people who will bring them on to different shows or to a feature. You’re still working in the industry. Whereas for screenwriters, it’s a little tough particularly to be in the industry unless you’re an assistant or something and a lot of us don’t want to do that.

Susan: We’ve been talking about the benefits of producing. I associate produced two independent features. Honing that skill, knowing how to navigate getting a film made from script to screen, raising money, working with entertainment attorneys, agents, talent and crews, was invaluable.

Trajectories and Detours

Sadie: You came through a non-traditional way of filmmaking to find your way into the studio system.

Susan Kouguell
Susan Kouguell

Susan: It was a confluence of things. I volunteered at the Independent Feature Film Market, working as a buyer liaison, putting filmmakers together with executives. This got my foot in the door. Soon I was hired as an acquisitions and talent consultant for Republic Pictures and Warner Bros., which led to working in various capacities at Paramount Pictures, Viacom, Punch Productions, and Miramax. With that experience combined with making my experimental short films, I worked with director Louis Malle on And the Pursuit of Happiness, which was a great experience. 

Meanwhile, I had started my screenplay and postproduction consulting company Su-City Pictures East, was a writer-for-hire on a dozen features, and later began my teaching career. I’ve always been juggling and cobbling out different jobs so I could continue making my own projects.

Sadie: I’ve had a similar experience. I had a writing partner right out of grad school; we met at AFI. We did writing-for-hire projects and specs. We were planning to work as ghost writers or do punch-ups for other writers, but you know, life happens. I fell back on producing because that’s how I started in the business working on music videos and other projects. I’ve also written things for other people, done script consulting; all of this helps finetune your craft.

Susan: What was your experience with writing spec scripts?

Sadie: It was a whirlwind coming out of an AFI, getting approached by agents, managers, and production companies. I was a young 20-something kid who didn’t know what she was doing. Either I was overthinking these opportunities, or I would be scared of turning something in that I didn’t think was perfect. In hindsight, it was never going to be perfect. Just turn it in, they want to read it.

Susan: It’s hard not to get one’s own way. There’s also that important aspect of following one’s own gut. Do you have an agent now?

Sadie: Not at the moment. I had a talent manager who hip-pocketed me. He had brought me on for a project and I wrote a short film based on an idea he had, and I worked with him on developing projects as a vehicle for talent. I was at AFI at the time, and I had so much schoolwork that I chose AFI over going down that path. It was a great learning experience because I was writing stuff that was going to actors to read and getting feedback.

After AFI, I was a producer of an independent feature documentary, I put all my creative focus and energy into that for about six years and put everything else on the back burner.

Susan: How did you get involved with Script magazine?

Sadie: I was in a writers’ group, and a friend there told me about a sales associate job at The Writers Store when it was a brick and mortar. Years later, Jeanne, who had been running Script for almost a decade, reached out to me and said she was looking to move on to Pipeline Artists. I never saw myself writing articles, running an online magazine, and running the show in this way.

You wrote for the magazine when it was an actual physical publication?

Susan: Yes. And, for the Writers Guild publication Written By.

Sadie: How did that come about?

Susan: I had spoken on a couple of panels for the Writers Guild, and they asked me to write some articles for them, which led to other freelance writing gigs. I then wrote two screenwriting books. Like you, I never saw myself writing for publications, but personal circumstances prompted me to discover unexpected opportunities.

Film Festivals Pros and Cons and Choosing What’s Right for You

Sadie: What are some key things to really focus on when entering?

Susan: Obviously it’s more advantageous to have your work seen in person at a festival, but online festivals can also widen the viewership and draw attention to you as a filmmaker and continue that networking and word of mouth going.

If it’s a newer festival, I question if it’s worth the submission fee. I also look at who the judges are. Having been a judge at festivals over the years, generally, the first-round judges are students or interns and not necessarily the filmmakers and executives you hope will see your work.

I use FilmFreeway, as well as other lists that focus on experimental films. What about you?

Sadie: I used FilmFreeway for this last short. It’s great because it does give you many filters or criteria. But it’s also dangerous because they’ll spam your inbox, and it can get expensive quickly.

My criteria is not the prize money. I also look at who’s judging and if there are any judges, is the festival going to be in person, and how long has the festival been running? Do I know other filmmakers who have been to the festival? Is it worth going to? 

Everyone wants to get into Sundance or South by Southwest, but it’s such a different ballpark. Generally, you need some money behind the film, and/or an A-list actor or someone with a name to really get you that visibility. There are a lot of great filmmakers out there who don’t have that access and I think they should all be included.

Susan: I agree. Why do you think things have changed?

Sadie: Some films are categorized as independent but then you look at the list of producers and there are big names or they’re affiliated with Netflix, for example,

I made my film We’re Good during the pandemic with an incredible cast and crew. It’s about a chronically content couple that realizes they have never had an actual argument and feel their relationship is lacking. A shocking turn in their evening leads to them exposing their secret feelings.

We're Good, key art
Courtesy Sadie Dean

I learned that my movie was too long at 14 minutes. It should have been 10 minutes or less because I want the actual opportunity to screen at a festival – they’re looking at programming running time. Programmers may say, ‘We liked it, but we just didn’t have room because we can put four other movies in the slot. And that’s just better for us. You know, but good luck with your movie.’

We got into the Austin Revolution Film Festival. One of my producers had screened there before and said you’re going to love it. It’s just a great atmosphere. Super independent. I thought, ‘Oh my God, these are my people.’ There are people from all walks of life, people who are working in the industry or not, and they’re making great art as filmmakers.

The festival director said it’s not about winning the prize, it’s the people you’re going to meet here and hopefully, walk away with. The biggest prize I got was meeting at least 10 new filmmakers that I’m now in touch with. I’m already helping produce a short film. I’m rebuilding that filmmaking tribe. And with these people, we can hold each other accountable.

Go to the festivals where you can find that community, who are like-minded and not there because they want to take a photo on the red carpet and with the hopes that they’ll win first place.

Susan: For us, it is a labor of love and our passion. For my recent feature-length documentary essay Inaugural, which received a SUNY Purchase Faculty Support Award, it’s challenging to find venues because it is a niche project; I was well aware of that when making it, but it didn’t stop me. It means hustling meetings and as in the studio system, it’s a revolving door of executives and curators.

Sadie: For a lot of people, they think finding success happens overnight. It’s ten years, if you’re lucky enough to get anything up and out and finding those eyeballs to see your work. There are so many opportunities, but there’s also the question of who do you go to and who do you trust? You don’t want to put all your eggs in the basket of one person who might be gone tomorrow.

The Day Job

Sadie: I find myself very fortunate that I get to work at Script and talk to filmmakers and still have my foot in the door, and being educated about what’s happening in the industry daily, and what films or TV shows are coming out and who’s who, and then the networking part of it. Talking about creative pursuits with other people and what they’re doing and their process, is all really inspiring.

Susan: For me, I’ve been fortunate that my steady job continues to be teaching screenwriting and film at universities. It’s also kept me in the film community, and it’s been wonderful to see many students find creative and personal success over the years.

Your editor-in-chief job encompasses a great deal!

Sadie: I have my editorial calendar, organizing what the contributors are doing, when it’s going to be turned in, and budgeting. I put the pieces in, edit them as needed. I get them into the system and schedule them. And then there’s the admin work behind the scenes. There’s also a lot of marketing that I do in terms of building our newsletters, talking to other organizations and fostering partnerships with them, and then also running The Writers Store. There’s a lot happening that feeds into what Script is doing.

I’m also conducting interviews, watching screeners, or prepping for an interview. And I’m dealing with publicists and scheduling interviews with their clients.

Susan: It’s a lot. There’s also the other element too, which is not only screening the films, but doing pre-interview background research about the filmmakers and their projects.

Who inspired you with the interviews that you’ve done for the magazine?

Sadie: One that definitely jumps out is Jonah Feingold who made Dating and New York. I interviewed him during the pandemic. I told him I wanted to get back into making films and he said in a nutshell, ‘Set a date, then start telling people when you’re going to make your movie, and then it becomes reality. Then these people are asking you next time they see you how your film is going. And then people with whom you might want to work you reach out to. They’re now holding you accountable for following through.’ I thought OK, I’m going to try that out. So, I set a date and started telling people I’m making this movie. And then I realized, I guess I have to do this thing. I took that to heart and ran with it.

I talk about the writing process with many filmmakers and try to apply it to my writing and see if that sticks. Monique Matthews had some great advice about approaching her writing routine. Which is she’ll stop writing a scene halfway through and save it for the next day – it’s a motivation to keep going the next day. It was a no-brainer. Why haven’t I thought of that? I’ve been doing that every morning, I have my next scene ready to go. I take these nuggets from other filmmakers that have helped a lot.

Who’s inspired you that you’ve interviewed?

Susan: Agnes Varda. I first interviewed her at the Locarno Film Festival, and then at her incredible exhibit of installation work at the Blum and Poe Gallery in New York. She offered me words of wisdom and a personal push I needed to return to making experimental films. Interviewing her daughter producer Rosalie Varda, as well as The Brink filmmakers Alison Klayman and Marie Therese Guirgis, and Occupied City filmmakers Steve McQueen and Brigit Stigter, among many others have been poignant and unforgettable conversations.

Sadie: For both of us we have that background of being through this pipeline and pulled in and pushed out in so many ways and learning from it, and we can speak to that. We have that shorthand with other filmmakers who are like, I see you, I get what you’re trying to do with your work, and let’s talk about it.

thin black line

Upcoming screenings

Barbie Dream House, still
Courtesy Susan Kouguell

Susan’s film Barbie Dream House is included in the Avant-barb(ie) group show at the San Francisco Cinematheque on May 16th.

thin black line

Sadie’s short film We’re Good will have its Los Angeles Premiere at the Beverly Hills Film Festival on May 2nd.