October 15, 2024 / sucity / Comments Off on Interview with Constance Tsang, Writer and Director of ‘Blue Sun Palace’
Susan Kouguell speaks with writer-director Constance Tsang about her poignant first feature film ‘Blue Sun Palace’ premiering at the Cannes Film Festival for Script Magazine.
As I watch Blue Sun Palace now, I have come to terms of what it means to me – a letter to the ghosts of childhood, to my parents who came to America with one dream and settled for another, to my father who I now understand, and to myself as I come to terms with redefining loss in my life.
– Constance Tsang
It was a pleasure to speak with Constance Tsangabout her poignant first feature filmBlue Sun Palace, premiering at the Cannes Film Festival’s Semaine de la Critique; it is the only US film selected.
Tsang, a Chinese American writer, director, and educator based in New York, received an MFA in Screenwriting and Directing from Columbia University. Her award-winning short film BEAU is a Vimeo StaffPick and her previous short film, CARNIVORE, was a 2018 AT&T Hello Lab project. Her work is supported by Starlight Stars Collective and Tribeca Film.
About Blue Sun Palace: Within the confines of a massage parlor in Flushing, Queens, Amy and Didi navigate romance, happiness, and the obligations of family thousands of miles from home. Despite the physical and emotional toll their work demands, the women have fortified an impenetrable sisterhood, which tragically collapses when disaster strikes on Lunar New Year.
Kouguell: Let’s begin with talking about your writing process.
Tsang: Itstarts with a feeling that I can’t escape. From there, I begin with constructing the story structure and what it looks like. And I do that with Post-its, I put inspirations, feelings, and thoughts on the Post-its, and the Post-its become the story, and the story becomes the outline, and then I start writing the screenplay. It’s low risk; you can put a character point or plot point on a Post-it and you can move it around or throw it out.
Kouguell: The tone, mood and atmosphere you created in the visual storytelling and pacing is captivating. What were some of your influences?
Tsang: The films of Chantal Akerman. I read Harold Pinter. I’m interested in how silence is used and ways spaces can linger.
Kouguell: The inspiration for your script came from losing your father as a teenager.
Tsang: At the core of the film is grief. It is something that drives a lot of decisions the characters make. It took me a long time to understand my own grief. I still have a hard time actually verbalizing it, and that difficulty to express grief was a thrust for this movie too through this process of writing and discovering these characters.
Kouguell: Tell me about the transition from making short films to Blue Sun Palace, which is your first feature.
Tsang: I made a couple of shorts in grad school, and it was a transition to jump in and understand the craft of it all. Moving to the feature space meant being able to be vulnerable; I couldn’t always do that in my shorts. It demanded more of me, and my understanding of the film’s emotional life. It’s almost as if things I was too scared about myself I had to let that go.
Kouguell: How did it all come together from script to screen?
Tsang: It took a long time, I had been writing this for five years. In the beginning, the first couple of drafts were not great, it was not the truest form. It took time to really understand what the story meant and what it meant to me.
Kouguell: It’s interesting that your two main actors Lee Kang ShengandKe-Xi Wuare also screenwriters and directors.
Tsang: They came to the story with such intelligence and understanding, it was amazing. They gave so much and were able to make the characters their own.
Kouguell: What’s next for you?
Tsang: I’ve started to write my next film about my mother.
Kouguell: Final thoughts?
Tsang: Especially since this article is aimed towards screenwriters I will say, write what you know. It’s very true. For me, it was a lot easier when writing a first feature to take from personal experiences.
Blue Sun Palace won the French Touch prize at the Semaine de la Critique, Cannes Film Festival.
June 23, 2024 / sucity / Comments Off on Susan Kouguell Interviews ‘Green Border’ Filmmaker Agnieszka Holland for Script Magazine
Agnieszka Holland discusses the inspiration behind the film, her collaboration with screenwriters Maciej Pisuk and Gabriela Lazarkiewicz, the creative decision behind filming in black and white, and more.
I had the pleasure to speak with Polish director and writer Agnieszka Holland about her latest feature film Green Border. A three-time Academy Award nominee (Angry Harvest, Europa Europa, and In Darkness), Holland, in addition to her numerous award-winning features, has also directed episodes of many notable television series, including Treme and House of Cards.
About Green Border
In the treacherous and swampy forests that make up the so-called “green border” between Belarus and Poland, refugees from the Middle East and Africa are lured by government propaganda, promising easy passage to the European Union. Unable to cross into Europe and unable to turn back, they find themselves trapped in a rapidly escalating geopolitical stand-off.
Winner of many international awards, including the Special Jury Prize at the 2023 Venice Film Festival, Green Border underscores the themes of ‘there are two sides to every story’ and the moral choices characters must face.
Kouguell: What was your initial inspiration for the film?
Holland: Reality was the inspiration. I made several films about the Holocaust, and Mr. Jones, about the crimes of Stalin and a Welsh journalist no one wants to listen to. In 2015, during the big crisis of refugees from Syria coming to Europe, people were afraid of the newcomers from those countries. It was easy to manipulate those fears with dictators like Putin, and the local extreme right and nationalistic movements. That’s why I wanted to tell that story, to humanize those who have been dehumanized by the propaganda and give them voices and faces.
Kouguell: The screenplay centers on three very different perspectives and viewpoints; the Syrian refugee family, a young border guard, and a middle-aged female activist. Tell me about your collaboration with your co-writers Maciej Pisuk and Gabriela Lazarkiewicz.
Holland: The film is based on real facts. I decided to try to make the film a few weeks after the crisis on the Polish border started. First, I did extensive research with everybody who knew something about the crisis or who was living through it and had a distinct point of view. I contacted two friends, one an experienced screenwriter who happened to be an activist and knew a lot of activists who were working on that border. And the second (screenwriter) was a young woman, who was pregnant when we were writing it and her sensibility was very important. Her husband is a doctor, an anesthesiologist, and he created a group of volunteers who went to the border and tried to help, and saved several lives.
My co-writers had experiences about the border, about the situation, about the logic of the activists and refugees. I talked to activists and refugees and collected recordings of conversations with them. At the beginning we thought people would be too afraid to talk to us, but by the end, even the border guards contacted us. It was important because it confirmed what the other side was saying and it confirmed the psychological aspects of what they were going through.
Then we had to decide our approach. We had two different opposite concepts; one was to find the moment, place and person and focus on that, or make it more epic and give multiple points of view. I decided to go for the second because I knew how much the migration crisis is present now for years although it’s not very well known. I wanted to show the complexity of the situation and show it through different eyes and different perspectives.
Kouguell: How did you structure the interweaving of these narratives?
Holland: We divided the storylines and everyone wrote their storylines based on their experience and research. After that we put it together, correcting and improving each other’s story and deciding on how they will be told in all, to find the emotional moments and the dramaturgy.
Kouguell: The film is shot in a quasi-documentary style.
Holland: We wanted that immediacy of that style and the camera in motion. In fact, it was impossible to shoot in a different way because we had such a short time and so many scenes and so many actions. I was very in sync with my cinematographer, and also the two women who were shooting the parallel units. There was a lot of footage, and after that, a lot of things were decided upon in the editing room.
Kouguell: Why did you choose to film in black and white?
Holland: I wanted a metaphorical quality and timelessness. You see the cell phones but at the same time it could be 1942. For the local people, a lot of imagery was striking especially in that area because of the tragic situations that took place there. During the Holocaust, it was close to the death camp where there was the uprising of the prisoners who were hiding in the same forest. There are a lot of hidden memories in that forest. To see these similar images in the film shows that it can come back.
Kouguell: The film received strong criticism from Polish politicians. Your reaction?
Holland: I expected it to some extent but I didn’t expect the hate campaign would come from the highest authorities and it would be so violent. Somehow it helped for the publicity of the film. People were very curious and went massively to see the film in Poland.
The new government is practically doing the same things and pushing the nationalist fear and the fear and hate of others. They’re using the migration crisis for their own means. I’m pessimistic about that but I’m very glad that we made the film and it is very important to many people.
Kouguell: Final thoughts?
Holland: At a Q & A after the film was shown in France, one young woman asked me if the film can change the world. I said, ‘No, I don’t think so, the world is too deeply in trouble.’ The woman said, ‘Maybe you didn’t change the world but you changed my world.’ That is the biggest satisfaction I can have.
Green Border opens in theaters in New York on June 21, 2024 at the Film Forum and on June 28, 2024 in Los Angeles at Laemmle Royal.
June 13, 2024 / sucity / Comments Off on Susan Kouguell’s Interview With ‘Vulcanizadora’ Writer/Director/Editor and Co-Star Joel Potrykus, Producer Ashley Potrykus and Star Joshua Burge at the Tribeca Festival
This dark comedy highlights Potrykus’s distinct vision with a gripping dramatic pulse, and unrelenting tone and atmosphere. Familiar themes in Potrykus’s work emerge again in ‘Vulcanizadora’: nihilism, isolation, loneliness, society-rejected outsider, however this time he digs further, tackling new territory about fatherhood and father/son relationships.
Written, directed, edited, and co-starring Joel Potrykus, Vulcanizadora, centers on two friends who trudge through a Michigan forest with the intention of following through on a disturbing pact. After they fail, one of them must return home to deal with the legal and emotional repercussions.
Joel Potrykus is a Michigan-based independent filmmaker, specializing in screenwriting and guerilla style production. His films have screened internationally and are currently streaming on the Criterion Channel. His screenplays are part of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Science Permanent Collection, and the George A. Romero Archival Collection. He received an MFA in Writing for Film and Television from Emerson College and is an assistant professor at Grand Valley State University.
It’s been over ten years since I first met husband and wife team Joel Potrykus and producer Ashley Potrykus at the 2014 Locarno Film Festival where I interviewed them about their award-winning film BUZZARD,starring long-time collaborator Joshua Burge. In 2012, their film APE, which also starred Burge, premiered at the Locarno International Film Festival, taking the Best Emerging Director – Filmmakers of the Present award and a Best First Feature – Special Mention.
Vulcanizadora,Potrykus’s latest feature,world premiered as part of Tribeca’s US Narrative Competition and this time I met with Joel and Ashley Potrykus in New York City now joined by stars Joshua Burge and Solo Potrykus, Joel and Ashley’s 6-year-old son.
This dark comedy highlights Potrykus’s distinct vision with a gripping dramatic pulse, and unrelenting tone and atmosphere. Familiar themes in Potrykus’s work emerge again in Vulcanizadora: nihilism, isolation, loneliness, society-rejected outsider, however this time he digs further, tackling new territory about fatherhood and father/son relationships.
Kouguell: The three of you have been collaborating for a long time along with your filmmaking team Sob Noisse.
Ashley Potrykus: I joined the Sob Noisse band for their first feature and Josh before that with Coyote. When I first joined, film was not my area at all and with each movie, it was another stepping stone and as that happened, our Sob Noisse band got bigger.
Joel Potrykus: At some point, I realized I couldn’t make a movie without Ashley; she’s the other half of my filmmaking brain that keeps everything organized and clears my thoughts.
It is like a band, and we call it Sob Noisse; I look at it like a musician band would be and everyone has the instrument they play. Josh is definitely like the lead singer, he’s the voice of what we’re trying to say and what people should be looking at. He’s got a certain face, persona and rhythm.
Joshua Burge: I never had any intention to be an actor, I went to school to be a filmmaker and to write. I got bit by the music bug while I was there and started performing, and Joel was a fan and then asked if I could be in one of his movies. The first one was Coyote and at that point, I didn’t really understand what acting was, and then with the first feature, Ape, I felt I was part of the Sob Noisse band.
Ashley Potrykus:Ape was the first time, at least for me, and I think for you, Josh, that we felt that we each came into our own role a little bit more.
Joshua Burge: When we started, everyone was wearing all the hats.
Kouguell: This is another low-budget feature for you.
Joel Potrykus: It’s the biggest budget we ever worked with but still a vastly low budget. We shot on 16 mm. I think it’s less rare that these micro-budget features are breaking out and we are now in the norm. We’ve shot on 16mm before but never a feature. We didn’t think it was financially feasible but it is. If you shoot the way we shoot, efficiently and economically and not burning through twenty takes, you can totally do it.
Kouguell: The script definitely does not follow a traditional 3-act structure. Just when I thought the plot was going to turn one way, it shifts. Yet, all these twists and turns are earned; they have been subtly set up. At times it also felt a little improvisational. How scripted was it?
Joshua Burge: It was very scripted. The only exception was sometimes we had an idea before we’d start rolling and we might try another line or an extra tack to bring something home. But for the most part, it was all on the page.
Joel Potrykus: I’ve always wanted to be an improv-style director so I was like, let’s start with an outline, we’ll shoot from an outline, but then it turned into a real script with real dialogue. We didn’t have the luxury to improvise when we were shooting.
Kouguell: How long was the shoot?
Joel Potrykus: We scheduled it for 10 days, which was really bonkers, but somehow we got it done in 8 days.
Ashley Potrykus: And we had a big location move, which was a two-hour drive with all of our gear and our crew, and closing up Airbnb’s within that time frame.
Joel Potrykus: We are a band, we know the rhythm, we know the beat.
Kouguell: How much input on the script did Ashley and Josh have?
Joel Potrykus: I’m a control freak so I wrote on my own. It was about the tone, and I know that Josh knows how to play that tone. We’ll all read it and then talk about it, and I’d take those ideas and incorporate it into a new draft.
Kouguell: In the opening scenes of your film, the music choices set an unsettling yet somewhat comedic tone and atmosphere. Let’s talk about the tone of the film.
Joel Potrykus: The three things Josh and I would say before the film were: “Sad, funny, scary.” We got to hit those.
Kouguell: We’ve been talking about the consequences of the characters’ actions. For Joshua’s character, seeking redemption is complicated and defies expectations for the viewer.
Joel Potrykus: It was the chance to see his character’s guilt and shame and remorse; he’s terrified of that redemption and what that means, and the repercussions of redemption.
Joshua Burge: I think my character is settling for relief, maybe not redemption.
Kouguell: Josh, the scenes you had with Solo were very powerful.
Joel Potrykus: What was it like to play Jeremy, Solo?
Solo Potrykus: Practice, practice, practice.
Ashley Potrykus: He didn’t love rehearsals, but one day he looked at us and said, “Mom, Dad, don’t worry, I got this.”
Joshua Burge: Solo nailed every line, he was so well-prepared and so professional.
Kouguell: Your script subverts the traditional screenwriting rules by breaking them and successfully defying the expectations for the viewer.
Joel Potrykus: I teach screenwriting and we use Save The Cat and I drill the 3-act structure. The more that I teach, the more confident I am subverting that 3-act structure because I know what audiences subconsciously expect these moments to happen; and so when they don’t happen, I feel like a lot of audiences will have a hard time following along with the structure so it’s my job to put in these little pieces that keep you holding on to the next scene. I like this script because there’s not even a midpoint, there’s a two-thirds point. I’m curious what the reaction will be because it’s not giving audiences what they are expecting.
Vulcanizadorahad its World Premiere at the 2024 Tribeca Film Festival in the US Narrative Competition.
Upcoming Tribeca screenings:
Tuesday, June 11 – 2:30 pm EST at Tribeca Film Center
Thursday, June 13 – 8:45 pm EST at AMC 19th St. East 6
June 13, 2024 / sucity / Comments Off on Susan Kouguell’s Interview with ‘Treasure’ Writer and Director Julia von Heinz at Tribeca Festival
Award-winning German filmmaker Julia von Heinz talks about her latest film ‘Treasure,’ from the adaptation process, dealing with transgenerational trauma as a theme, and what she hopes audiences take away from seeing the film.
I had the pleasure to speak with award-winning German filmmaker Julia von Heinz about her latest film Treasure, which had its world premiere at the Tribeca Festival.
Award-winning director and screenwriter, von Heinz won the German Film Award for Best Children’s and Youth Film with her debut, Nothing Else Matters, her 2020 film And Tomorrow the Entire Worldcompeted at the 77th Venice Film Festival and was nominated for Best Film at the German Film Awards. She earned her doctorate at the Film University Konrad Wolf in Babelsberg and teaches directing at the University of Television and Film in Munich.
About Treasure: Set in the 1990s, Lena Dunham plays Ruth, an American businesswoman who takes her father Edek (Stephen Fry), a charmingly stubborn Holocaust survivor, on a road trip through Poland to make sense of her family’s past. Treasure is the third part of von Heinz’s Aftermath Trilogy, which deals with the repercussions of the Holocaust in Germany and globally.
Kouguell: The script is an adaptation of Lily Brett’s best-selling autobiographical novel Too Many Men. Tell me about the adaptation process and working with your co-writer and husband John Quester.
Julia von Heinz: This is the fifth project I have co-written with my husband. Sometimes it’s very difficult because we sleep with the characters and wake up with the characters and we are in love with the characters. It keeps the relationship alive.
I like the process of working together. We’ve known each other for 25 years, and have been through a huge pool of events together. We both loved the novel. My mother gave it to me in the late 90s. (Like Lily Brett, von Heinz’s mother is the daughter of a Jewish survivor and part of that “second generation” to which Lily had given a voice.)
It’s a 700-page novel with a lot of side plots that you don’t see in the movie. It took us a long time to get to the core of the father and daughter story. (von Heinz describes their relationship as a “love story” between two individuals who could not be less alike.)
Kouguell: How much input did Lily Brett have during this process?
Julia von Heinz: Lily was at our side. She was so interested in the process and read from the very first draft to the last draft. It’s such a personal story for her.
Kouguell: Tell me about taking this script to the screen.
Julia von Heinz: Once we had the script I felt I could rely on it when we started filming. When we were on set and working closely with my cinematographer, I knew I could fill in the voids of elements that were not in the novel and bring my energy to make it flow. It’s the most challenging film in my career thus far.
Kouguell: You spent three days shooting at Auschwitz.
Julia von Heinz: Thefirst time I went was in 2016 and it was a shock to experience. I returned many times after that. We were allowed to film outside the fence and in the parking lot along the border because we couldn’t interfere when visitors were there and film crews are not allowed inside. Our crew was permitted to take photographs near the barracks and our visual effects team could insert images behind the two actors in post-production.
Kouguell: The film centers on the theme of transgenerational trauma; father and daughter deal with their respective traumas quite differently. How did you approach this in the script and then onto the screen?
Julia von Heinz: In Lily’s book, there was so much inner monologue with the character always questioning herself and we couldn’t adapt that for the script. We didn’t want to use voiceover.
For example, we needed to find a way to convey the self-harming that is in the novel to the screen. In the novel, it is portrayed with her dieting and the difficulties about her mother. In the script, we conveyed her self-harming by her tattooing. We discussed this with Lily and she agreed that this was a good action to show.
Kouguell: What is your reaction when people dismiss Treasure without seeing it by saying it’s just ‘another holocaust film’?
Julia von Heinz: I heard that a lot. There isn’t a film about the second generation, and this is a generation that we need to tell stories about. We know that this trauma exists, and even exists in the third generation. I feel we should tell these stories, and I feel very confident about this.
Kouguell: What do you want the audience to come away with after seeing this film?
Julia von Heinz:I want to tell my audience to call your mother, father, children – and share stories that might not be easy to share and build a bridge. Share stories that are not only related to the Holocaust. There are so many important stories to share, especially with a father.
Treasure opens in Theaters nationwide on June 14, 2024.
Treasurehad its International Premiere at the 2024 Tribeca Film Festival in the Spotlight Narrative.
June 13, 2024 / sucity / Comments Off on Susan’s Interview with ‘The Freshly Cut Grass’ Filmmaker Celina Murga, Presented by Martin Scorsese at the Tribeca Festival
Celina Murga discusses the scriptwriting process, the major themes of gender roles in the workplace and at home, and the conflicts and repercussions of the actions of the male and female professor in each of these environments.
Premiering at the Tribeca Festival in the international narrative competition The Freshly Cut Grass directed by Celina Murga, and written by Murga, Juan Villegas, and Lucía Osorio, is executive produced by Martin Scorsese.
About the Film
A male professor at a university is in conflict with his own roles as husband, father and teacher. The eventual relationship with a female student highlights his crisis. As in a mirror, a female professor, also in crisis, has an eventual relationship with a male student. The duplicate story questions the power relations between genders.
I had the pleasure to speak with Argentinian writer, director and producer Celina Murga during the Tribeca Festival about The Freshly Cut Grass. We discussed the scriptwriting process, and the major themes of gender roles in the workplace and at home, and the conflicts and repercussions of the actions of the male and female professor in each of these environments.
The parallel storylines are thought-provoking, and avoid cliche and predictability.
Kouguell: Let’s start with the evolution of Freshly Cut Grass from script to screen.
Celina Murga: It was a challenging process from the beginning because we knew that the possibilities of telling the two stories about human relationships are complex. It was challenging to mirror the stories.
We worked a lot with the actors. We shot first with Joaquín [Furriel] and then the Marina [de Tavira] story to mirror the story on a set. We worked hard to try to find a way to connect with their situations and to build these characters, knowing the complexities they are immersed in.
Kouguell: Tell me about your screenplay collaboration with your co-writers Juan Villegas, and Lucía Osorio.’
Celina Murga: I always like to be involved in the writing process and write stories I care about. I like to work with others who give their point of view to what I’m doing. It’s a very democratic process. Sometimes in the beginning, Juan and I wrote one character, I wrote about Natalie and he wrote about Pablo and then we switched characters.
We were going to shoot in 2020 but then there was the pandemic. During this time we kept reflecting about the story and characters. We showed the script to others we trusted because it was important to figure out if the situations were subtle enough.
Kouguell: In his executive producer role, what input did Martin Scorsese have on your film?
Celina Murga: He allowed us to reach more producers. In a more creative way, he read the first version and saw one of the first edited versions. He was part of the creative process, and very supportive and generous with me. He’s someone who likes to be there and be part of it, and at the same time aware of me as a woman director and not someone to push the story he wants to tell on me. In that deeply profound way, he is a true mentor in allowing me to find my own voice.
Kouguell: You mentioned that the story developed from two characters in crisis, and that this idea proposed a very particular structure that restricts and provokes certain ideas of mise en scène, and aims to be a mirror in which two very similar stories take place. How did you develop the script’s structure?
Celina Murga: When we started writing this film in 2018, in Argentina we were in a big movement regarding families and we were talking about these ideas of how men and women are sometimes different and many times are also equal.
In the story we wrote, we knew that these two characters were going to be in a middle-age crisis and in a particular moment in their lives, asking about themselves as fathers, mothers and teachers. An important part of the process was to find the scenes where they were similar and at the same time not literally similar, and that was a really beautiful process to find a way that each character has their own particularities.
It happened in the script but also in the editing room process; the editing room is another way of rewriting the script and it’s very important.
Kouguell: Although the film is set in Argentina, the story feels universal.
Celina Murga: Argentina is where I was born and my home, a place where I know and am interested in talking about human behaviors. And it is very universal. For me, the film is about how we relate to each other and what it is to be a family, and what it is to be in a marriage of many years. It also questions how society and culture have made us a part of these systems. My main goal is to find more honest ways of being together in this world.
The Freshly Cut Grasshad its World Premiere at the 2024 Tribeca Film Festival in the International Narrative Competition.
Upcoming Tribeca screenings:
Thursday, June 13 – 3:00 pm EST at AMC 19th St. East 6
Friday, June 14 – 3:15 pm EST at Village East by Angelika
May 10, 2024 / sucity / Comments Off on Susan’s Interview with Steve McQueen and Bianca Stigter about their Documentary ‘Occupied City’
In a deeply personal conversation with filmmakers Steve McQueen and Bianca Stigter, they discuss the recurring themes of time, memory, and history in their respective work and in their collaboration on ‘Occupied City,’ as well as breaking the rules of traditional documentary filmmaking.
About Occupied City: The past collides with our precarious present in Occupied City, informed by the book Atlas of an Occupied City (Amsterdam 1940-1945) written by Bianca Stigter. McQueen creates two interlocking portraits: a door-to-door excavation of the Nazi occupation that still haunts his adopted city, and a vivid journey through the last years of pandemic and protest.
Steve McQueen is a British film director, film producer, screenwriter, and video artist. His film 12 Years A Slave received an Academy Award, two BAFTA Awards and in 2016 the BFI Fellowship. McQueen’s critically acclaimed and award-winning films also include Hunger (2008), Shame (2011), Widows (2018) and the anthology series Small Axe. Past documentary works include the BAFTA-winning series Uprising (2021). For his work as a visual artist, McQueen was awarded with the Turner Prize, and he represented Great Britain at the Venice Biennale in 2009. He has exhibited in major museums around the world. In 2020, McQueen was awarded a knighthood in the Queen’s New Year’s Honours List for his services to the Arts.
Bianca Stigter is an historian and cultural critic. She writes for the Dutch newspaper NRC Handelsblad and published three books of essays. Stigter was an associate producer on 12 Years a Slave and Widows. In 2019 she published the book Atlas of an Occupied City. Amsterdam 1940-1945. In 2021 she directed the documentary Three Minutes – A Lengthening, which premiered in the Giornate degli Autori at the Venice Film Festival and was selected for the festivals of Telluride, Toronto, Sundance, as well as IDFA and DocA- viv. It won the 2022 Yad Vashem Award for cinematic excellence in a Holocaust related Documentary.
There is a haunting quality to Occupied City, hearing the emotionless voiceover text about the Nazi occupation of Amsterdam over images of contemporary life in Amsterdam. With encouragement from McQueen and Stigter I began this interview on a personal note, recounting when I saw the film at a recent press screening. Images of the neighborhood Apollolaan where my mother grew up, and the text about the Hunger Winter, the countless atrocities, including the many Jews forced into hiding, and the specific identification cards with the letter J stamped on it. My grandmother was among those in hiding, and she too had these documents, which I shared with McQueen and Stigter. I thanked them for allowing me the time to share this with them and expressed that this interview is not about my story, but about their film.
McQueen: It’s all of our stories. I don’t think you should leave yourself out of this interview; it would not be in service to your readers. It’s important to have this transparency. To be honest with you, it’s wonderful to add your experience into the interview because you’re a survivor of this situation.
Kouguell: Steve, in your interview with curator Donna DeSalvo in 2016 at the Whitney Museum, you discussed your installation piece End Credits about the Paul Robeson FBI files. The idea/theme of words being redacted, brought to mind not only the obvious government censorship but the idea of the literal erasure of history.
There is a thematic correlation between this work End Credits and Occupied City, and Bianca’s documentary: Three Minutes: A Lengthening Trailer. These works are historical investigations, which address the erasure of history, and the fragility of memory and time.
Stigler: What they also share is that you can find new forms to deal with the past and you don’t necessarily have to stick to the strictly well-known feature film or documentary genre, you can try to find a new way to convey history and the erasure of certain histories. And, also to make it more of an experience than a history lesson. There’s certainly common ground there.
McQueen: Both of us are very much about the audience and how things can sink in. With End Credits, it’s much more sculptural than Occupied City and Three Minutes, it’s for an art space due to the nature of its presentation.
Kouguell:Occupied City’s length of 4 ½ hours including an intermission requires a type of commitment from an audience. If it was two hours, for example, I don’t think the film would have the same impact. Steve, you mentioned that the film had to have the weight of time, the weight of recounting history, and to give the viewer time to reflect.
McQueen: Once people see the film, the length is never discussed. If anything, when it comes into discussion people wish it was longer.
Stigter: People said they lost any track of time. You enter a different zone of time, you don’t feel the clock ticking and you are transported somewhere else. One thing is for sure; you hear so many individual stories and you see so many people that you realize you can’t hear everyone’s story, then the film would have to be 100,00 times longer. It gives you a certain tension that no matter what you do, you can never know it all.
McQueen: It’s about the practice. It was the whole idea of using Bianca’s text, which occurred over 19-20 years of research, and projecting on that the every day. We never contemplated it to be shorter. When I was shooting it, I didn’t know what it was going to be, I had to find it through the process of filmmaking.
Kouguell: Bianca, in your film Three Minutes: A Lengthening,you made the decision not to show any contemporary faces except at the very end. We only see the three minutes of footage repeatedly shown and freeze frames of a home movie in 1938 Nasielsk in eastern Poland months before they were deported to ghettos by the invading Nazis.
With Three Minutes: A Lengthening and Occupied City you both made some unconventional choices in conveying your narrative, such as avoiding talking heads, and not including or only including archival footage from the past.
Stigter: In Three Minutes, it exists only out of archival footage from 1938. Doing things in this way makes you think about time more. With the other forms of documentary, people almost forget there are also forms; here you are asked to think about it.
Kouguell:Occupied City was shot over the course of 2 ½ years on 35mm film, and you had 34 hours of footage. With the exterior shots, did people know you were filming them?
McQueen: Most of the time people knew because the camera was there but sometimes not. It was the case of getting the everyday and wanting to be spontaneous.
Kouguell: Was anything staged? I’m thinking about the scene where the bicyclist hits a woman towards the end of the film.
McQueen: It just happened. Sometimes you have to predict the unpredictable.
Kouguell: There is a huge responsibility to the history of Amsterdam, the people of the past, and the present. Obviously you cannot include it all so the choices then become what to include or embrace, what to honor, what to leave out. How did you arrive at these decisions in Occupied City?
McQueen:We shot everything in Atlas of an Occupied City – over 2,100 addresses. When we had the footage, it was a case of certain things being repeated so therefore we could leave that out, and then we decided what was the best for that particular version. What flowed and what didn’t. We were fortunate to have this rich footage and situations to make this movie.
Stigter: When I was writing the book, the most harrowing part was when I couldn’t find any information about someone except that he or she was born and murdered, and that was all. If you can keep a little bit by telling about someone, there is at least something left instead of nothing. For me that was difficult to come to terms with; you can’t tell everything.
Kouguell: Bianca, I read that you referred to your book Atlas as “time machine on paper” – it’s a beautiful way to reference it.
Stigter: For me, it felt like that because you have a lot of history books that deal with the big picture or have the story of one person. What fascinated me was, could you imagine walking through a certain street back in that time so you knew things about the shops and the offices and the people that lived there; that you can get a sense of how something was in a different time and that fascinated me.
The strange thing about Amsterdam, in the city center, the canals, and so on, is that they are very much from the 17th and 18th century. You cannot see the Second World War and what happened there but you know it happened in the same spots where people were round up or executed, or took their own lives. The book and the film both try to cross that, while at the same time acknowledging that it is uncrossable. There are all kinds of tension between the past and present throughout the whole film.
Kouguell: What questions haven’t you been asked in previous interviews that you would like to address about Occupied City?
Stigter: The music; it’s very important for movies in general and in this movie, it is especially important.
McQueen: What composer Oliver Coates brought to the table was so transcendent; it brings another layer into the narrative, another echo in the audio sense.
Stigler: It makes it more abstract in a way but also grounds it very much.
Kouguell: What was then and what is now repeats for me. Ending with the bar mitzvah rehearsal and then the actual bar mitzvah was quite moving.
McQueen: We were invited to our friends’ son’s bar mitzvah. We thought it would be a good idea to shoot it. It was one of those things that everything in this movie is about our city; it’s about where we live, where our children go to school. We talked to the rabbi for permission.
In a way, it was to say that after all that, the Nazis didn’t win. There is a Jewish life that continues and exists in Amsterdam today. It was a very personal way to end the film. It’s about our family and our friends, and all of our futures.
Stigter: It’s beautiful and hopeful. It’s something fragile of course. We see and hear the boy’s voice trying to read the old words – it is very touching for me. It was also about not showing just the bad things but also the good things.
Kouguell: What has been the response to Occupied City from the Dutch audience?
Stigter: We had the Dutch premiere in the most beautiful cinema in the world, the Tuschinski theatre. The original owner was murdered in Auschwitz during the war.
McQueen: It was extremely special to have the premiere there and we dedicated it to him. It was a packed theater. You could feel the atmosphere was special to put this movie in this cinema.
Stigter: To see it in Amsterdam or another cinema, when you walk outside, I think one will have the feeling, I’ll look differently at my city now. In a funny way of course, people realize yes, that it’s very extremely local but it also has something universal. One can imagine this film in Paris or in London or New York. One can imagine the film anywhere.
Kouguell: Indeed. It is universal.
McQueen: Your background and history is amazing and thank you for sharing it with us.
Occupied Cityis in limited release in theaters and is available on most streaming platforms.
May 10, 2024 / sucity / Comments Off on Pulling the Curtain Back at Script Magazine with Editor-In-Chief Sadie Dean and Senior Contributing Editor Susan Kouguell
We each come from a unique position as filmmakers ourselves, which offers a shorthand, not to mention inspiration when interviewing screenwriters and filmmakers. They’re appreciative when we find nuances in their work that perhaps no one has commented on before and for us, it often gives us further insight into our own projects.
Susan: One of the most common questions that I get from my students and Su-City clients is the importance of going to film school. There is no one-size-fits-all answer; it depends on the types of films you want to make and your career goals.
After undergraduate school, I was a fellow at the Whitney Independent Study Program, which was a perfect match for my practice as an experimental filmmaker. Now decades later, many of us remain close. Having that community is invaluable.
You attended the American Film Institute in the screenwriting program. How was that experience?
Sadie: It’s a super intense program. You’re writing, producing, and just putting out work constantly. What’s so good about that program is that you are in this really great group of people who are fostering what you’re trying to do as a creative. You have all the support systems to make your projects, and if you fall down in terms of writing, they lift you back up in some way.
It’s all traditional narrative filmmaking and linear storytelling.
A lot of us came straight out of undergrad school and in our early 20s, and taking out an incredibly large loan, not realizing how that’s going to affect your future. You hope that you’re going to sell a big script and make it big, but that’s not the reality. Coming out of film school and not having that support system anymore is hard. You can’t just necessarily say, OK, I’m going to make this film, and I have these people and the money to do it, because the school’s basically giving it to you or giving it to you from your own tuition.
I think there is a benefit in going to a film school like that, because you’re going there not only to make movies and work on your voice as a storyteller, but you’re networking. The first day there I remember being told: ‘look to your left, look to your right, look in front of you, look behind you, you’re paying for your network, you don’t know if the person is going to be your agent, or your producer, or your director.’
You’re building that film tribe. You never know who they’re going to know and put you in touch with. But then after the program is over, there’s that feeling of where I find my people again. Some are smart and go in different directions.
Susan: Define smart.
Sadie: They’re not ‘just’ screenwriters. I feel like if you’re going into this business, and you want a career after film school, become an editor or cinematographer because there’s a lot more work there and not as much for a first-time screenwriter out the gate. Unfortunately, I wish there was.
There is just more accessibility, I think especially for editors. I know a lot of editors who say, ‘Yes, I’m on a reality show, but I’m paying my bills.’ They’re networking with other people who will bring them on to different shows or to a feature. You’re still working in the industry. Whereas for screenwriters, it’s a little tough particularly to be in the industry unless you’re an assistant or something and a lot of us don’t want to do that.
Susan: We’ve been talking about the benefits of producing. I associate produced two independent features. Honing that skill, knowing how to navigate getting a film made from script to screen, raising money, working with entertainment attorneys, agents, talent and crews, was invaluable.
Trajectories and Detours
Sadie: You came through a non-traditional way of filmmaking to find your way into the studio system.
Susan: It was a confluence of things. I volunteered at the Independent Feature Film Market, working as a buyer liaison, putting filmmakers together with executives. This got my foot in the door. Soon I was hired as an acquisitions and talent consultant for Republic Pictures and Warner Bros., which led to working in various capacities at Paramount Pictures, Viacom, Punch Productions, and Miramax. With that experience combined with making my experimental short films, I worked with director Louis Malle on And the Pursuit of Happiness, which was a great experience.
Meanwhile, I had started my screenplay and postproduction consulting company Su-City Pictures East, was a writer-for-hire on a dozen features, and later began my teaching career. I’ve always been juggling and cobbling out different jobs so I could continue making my own projects.
Sadie: I’ve had a similar experience. I had a writing partner right out of grad school; we met at AFI. We did writing-for-hire projects and specs. We were planning to work as ghost writers or do punch-ups for other writers, but you know, life happens. I fell back on producing because that’s how I started in the business working on music videos and other projects. I’ve also written things for other people, done script consulting; all of this helps finetune your craft.
Susan: What was your experience with writing spec scripts?
Sadie: It was a whirlwind coming out of an AFI, getting approached by agents, managers, and production companies. I was a young 20-something kid who didn’t know what she was doing. Either I was overthinking these opportunities, or I would be scared of turning something in that I didn’t think was perfect. In hindsight, it was never going to be perfect. Just turn it in, they want to read it.
Susan: It’s hard not to get one’s own way. There’s also that important aspect of following one’s own gut. Do you have an agent now?
Sadie: Not at the moment. I had a talent manager who hip-pocketed me. He had brought me on for a project and I wrote a short film based on an idea he had, and I worked with him on developing projects as a vehicle for talent. I was at AFI at the time, and I had so much schoolwork that I chose AFI over going down that path. It was a great learning experience because I was writing stuff that was going to actors to read and getting feedback.
After AFI, I was a producer of an independent feature documentary, I put all my creative focus and energy into that for about six years and put everything else on the back burner.
Susan: How did you get involved with Script magazine?
Sadie: I was in a writers’ group, and a friend there told me about a sales associate job at The Writers Store when it was a brick and mortar. Years later, Jeanne, who had been running Script for almost a decade, reached out to me and said she was looking to move on to Pipeline Artists. I never saw myself writing articles, running an online magazine, and running the show in this way.
You wrote for the magazine when it was an actual physical publication?
Susan: Yes. And, for the Writers Guild publication Written By.
Sadie: How did that come about?
Susan: I had spoken on a couple of panels for the Writers Guild, and they asked me to write some articles for them, which led to other freelance writing gigs. I then wrote two screenwriting books. Like you, I never saw myself writing for publications, but personal circumstances prompted me to discover unexpected opportunities.
Film Festivals Pros and Cons and Choosing What’s Right for You
Sadie: What are some key things to really focus on when entering?
Susan: Obviously it’s more advantageous to have your work seen in person at a festival, but online festivals can also widen the viewership and draw attention to you as a filmmaker and continue that networking and word of mouth going.
If it’s a newer festival, I question if it’s worth the submission fee. I also look at who the judges are. Having been a judge at festivals over the years, generally, the first-round judges are students or interns and not necessarily the filmmakers and executives you hope will see your work.
I use FilmFreeway, as well as other lists that focus on experimental films. What about you?
Sadie: I used FilmFreeway for this last short. It’s great because it does give you many filters or criteria. But it’s also dangerous because they’ll spam your inbox, and it can get expensive quickly.
My criteria is not the prize money. I also look at who’s judging and if there are any judges, is the festival going to be in person, and how long has the festival been running? Do I know other filmmakers who have been to the festival? Is it worth going to?
Everyone wants to get into Sundance or South by Southwest, but it’s such a different ballpark. Generally, you need some money behind the film, and/or an A-list actor or someone with a name to really get you that visibility. There are a lot of great filmmakers out there who don’t have that access and I think they should all be included.
Susan: I agree. Why do you think things have changed?
Sadie: Some films are categorized as independent but then you look at the list of producers and there are big names or they’re affiliated with Netflix, for example,
I made my film We’re Goodduring the pandemic with an incredible cast and crew.It’s about a chronically content couple that realizes they have never had an actual argument and feel their relationship is lacking. A shocking turn in their evening leads to them exposing their secret feelings.
I learned that my movie was too long at 14 minutes. It should have been 10 minutes or less because I want the actual opportunity to screen at a festival – they’re looking at programming running time. Programmers may say, ‘We liked it, but we just didn’t have room because we can put four other movies in the slot. And that’s just better for us. You know, but good luck with your movie.’
We got into the Austin Revolution Film Festival. One of my producers had screened there before and said you’re going to love it. It’s just a great atmosphere. Super independent. I thought, ‘Oh my God, these are my people.’ There are people from all walks of life, people who are working in the industry or not, and they’re making great art as filmmakers.
The festival director said it’s not about winning the prize, it’s the people you’re going to meet here and hopefully, walk away with. The biggest prize I got was meeting at least 10 new filmmakers that I’m now in touch with. I’m already helping produce a short film. I’m rebuilding that filmmaking tribe. And with these people, we can hold each other accountable.
Go to the festivals where you can find that community, who are like-minded and not there because they want to take a photo on the red carpet and with the hopes that they’ll win first place.
Susan: For us, it is a labor of love and our passion. For my recent feature-length documentary essay Inaugural, which received a SUNY Purchase Faculty Support Award, it’s challenging to find venues because it is a niche project; I was well aware of that when making it, but it didn’t stop me. It means hustling meetings and as in the studio system, it’s a revolving door of executives and curators.
Sadie: For a lot of people, they think finding success happens overnight. It’s ten years, if you’re lucky enough to get anything up and out and finding those eyeballs to see your work. There are so many opportunities, but there’s also the question of who do you go to and who do you trust? You don’t want to put all your eggs in the basket of one person who might be gone tomorrow.
The Day Job
Sadie: I find myself very fortunate that I get to work at Script and talk to filmmakers and still have my foot in the door, and being educated about what’s happening in the industry daily, and what films or TV shows are coming out and who’s who, and then the networking part of it. Talking about creative pursuits with other people and what they’re doing and their process, is all really inspiring.
Susan: For me, I’ve been fortunate that my steady job continues to be teaching screenwriting and film at universities. It’s also kept me in the film community, and it’s been wonderful to see many students find creative and personal success over the years.
Your editor-in-chief job encompasses a great deal!
Sadie: I have my editorial calendar, organizing what the contributors are doing, when it’s going to be turned in, and budgeting. I put the pieces in, edit them as needed. I get them into the system and schedule them. And then there’s the admin work behind the scenes. There’s also a lot of marketing that I do in terms of building our newsletters, talking to other organizations and fostering partnerships with them, and then also running The Writers Store. There’s a lot happening that feeds into what Script is doing.
I’m also conducting interviews, watching screeners, or prepping for an interview. And I’m dealing with publicists and scheduling interviews with their clients.
Susan: It’s a lot. There’s also the other element too, which is not only screening the films, but doing pre-interview background research about the filmmakers and their projects.
Who inspired you with the interviews that you’ve done for the magazine?
Sadie: One that definitely jumps out is Jonah Feingold who made Dating and New York. I interviewed him during the pandemic. I told him I wanted to get back into making films and he said in a nutshell, ‘Set a date, then start telling people when you’re going to make your movie, and then it becomes reality. Then these people are asking you next time they see you how your film is going. And then people with whom you might want to work you reach out to. They’re now holding you accountable for following through.’ I thought OK, I’m going to try that out. So, I set a date and started telling people I’m making this movie. And then I realized, I guess I have to do this thing. I took that to heart and ran with it.
Italk about the writing process with many filmmakers and try to apply it to my writing and see if that sticks. Monique Matthews had some great advice about approaching her writing routine. Which is she’ll stop writing a scene halfway through and save it for the next day – it’s a motivation to keep going the next day. It was a no-brainer. Why haven’t I thought of that? I’ve been doing that every morning, I have my next scene ready to go. I take these nuggets from other filmmakers that have helped a lot.
Sadie: For both of us we have that background of being through this pipeline and pulled in and pushed out in so many ways and learning from it, and we can speak to that. We have that shorthand with other filmmakers who are like, I see you, I get what you’re trying to do with your work, and let’s talk about it.
December 18, 2023 / sucity / Comments Off on Susan’s Interview with ‘South of Hope Street’ Writer and Director Jane Spencer for Script Magazine
September 2023
Writer and director Jane Spencer, an expat American independent filmmaker based in Zurich, Switzerland, talks about her four features and her decades-long career.
Fresh off her award as a filmmaker from Producers Without Borders at the Venice Film Festival 2023 for ‘Auteur and Poetic Filmmaking’, I spoke with writer and director Jane Spencer, an expat American independent filmmaker based in Zurich, Switzerland, about her four features and her decades-long career.
KOUGUELL: Congratulations on your recent award at the Venice Film Festival.
SPENCER: It was quite a surprise and a great honor.
KOUGUELL: You are a fiercely independent filmmaker who made a conscious decision to not work in the studio system.
SPENCER: My pieces are so personal; it’s very hard for me to work for the studios. I tend to be a loner as to ideas and what I want to make. I am moved by European cinema, which tends to be auteur cinema, including Wim Wenders and Agnes Varda, as well as American filmmakers like Tom DiCello and Alison Anders who came up in the 1990s.
KOUGUELL: You studied in the United States, including the Actors Studio Playwrights/Directors Unit in New York City and film at New York University. How did these experiences influence you?
SPENCER: At the Actors Studio I was inspired by the legendary directors Elia Kazan, Arthur Penn and Joe Mankiewicz, among others. I remember Kazan saying that writers should direct their own movies and I took that to heart. When I was at NYU, Spike Lee suggested we shoot a three-minute teaser and to make it look as good as we can; that’s how he made his first movie.
So, I wrote Little Noises, which took one year. I worked with writer Anthony Brito, who came up with the idea, and Jon Zeiderman and I wrote it. I took the project to producer Sandra Schulberg who liked the teaser and script, and thanks to her, got it to Henry Jaglom who had formed his women’s film company. Henry got the film off the ground and gave it to producers who raised the financing.
KOUGUELL:Little Noises premiered in 1991 at Sundance and was nominated for a Grand Jury Prize. The making of this film was quite a journey for you.
SPENCER: I consider Little Noises the boot camp for everything that could happen – happened. It was a difficult time; I didn’t have much power on the film and the producers chopped up my movie. I am grateful to them for raising the finance and trusting me to shoot it, but unfortunately they were also new producers and they mishandled the film totally, and did not look after it and still don’t. I am currently trying to get it back so that it can have a new life after the abysmal thing they pulled at Sundance; my film was accepted to Sundance on my rough cut. They recut several ‘key’ sections of it without my permission, which – in my opinion and many others’ opinions – harmed the screening. I did get it back and I recut it properly and we got some very good reviews and a theatrical release based on my new cut, which was based on my original rough cut. I continue to be so proud of Little Noises; both Crispin Glover and Steven Schub gave brilliant performances.
After that experience I became a producer on all my movies. As a director, at least in the American system, once you option your work, you give up your copyright, unless you’re a Scorsese, and even then, they can cut it, put in different music, and so on.
KOUGUELL: You also write and direct your own plays.
SPENCER: I worked in theater in England, Los Angeles and New York to recover from my first film, and then worked with theater producer Steven Adams, who now works with Spike Lee. I decided to take one of my plays, Faces on Mars, a dark comedy about a bunch of actors living in one room in Silver Lake and adapted it to a screenplay. It premiered at the Solothurn Film Festival in Switzerland.
KOUGUELL: In 2014, your next feature The Ninth Cloud premiered at the Raindance Film Festival in London. Let’s talk about that process.
The Ninth Cloud
A dark, existential comedy about a young woman trying to find answers to the meaning of existence. In London she runs into a pack of strange characters, from bohemian struggling artistes to monied British aristocrats with all their varying agendas, as she tries to help an impoverished immigrant child with a leg problem.
SPENCER: This experience taught me how to produce movies. First I shot a trailer for the film, and from that raised the financing independently and did the casting, and so on – it took about four years. After Raindance, the film went on to the Shanghai International Film Festival (CN), La Femme Film Festival (Los Angeles), and the Glasgow Film Festival in Scotland. The film garnered great reviews and was released in April 2018 in Europe and the UK and can be seen on iTunes and Amazon Prime in the USA and UK.
KOUGUELL: You have your own production company in Zurich.
SPENCER: Mostly I work through my own company Ward9 Productions, with my partner Marc Holthuizen. Once in a while, I will work on other people’s scripts. Right now I’m working with Robbie Wolliver and his wife Marilyn Wolliver on Robbie’s award-winning play Folk City, which I’m very excited about.
KOUGUELL: Let’s talk about your fourth feature, your new filmSouth of Hope Street, which you described as a fable-like story about contemporary times.
South of Hope Street
In 2038 earth reaches a cosmic tipping point and enters a mysterious universe. To perpetuate the old order, people hide behind a gigantic wall and engage in wars. In this dystopian wonderland, Denise (Tanna Frederick) walks on thin ice to believe in her future, spurred on by Tom (Judd Nelson), a caretaker, who promises that a renaissance is on its way. Also starring William Baldwin, Jack McEvoy, Patricia Sluka, Meredith Ostrom, Pascal Ulli, Angelo Boffa, Asser Yassin, Gianin Loffler, Barry O’Rourke and Michael Madsen as Benjamin Flowers.
KOUGUELL: Similar to some of your previous projects, this began as a short film.
SPENCER: Yes, the short starredTanna Frederick and Hilmir Snaer Gudnason of 101 Reykjavik. We shot the feature in Switzerland in Zurich and in the Swiss Alps of Maloja, near St. Moritz. We all stayed at the giant empty hotel The Maloja Palace; and the actors recalled that it was like The Shining. (Jane laughs). The cast and crew were wonderful.
KOUGUELL: You mentioned that you needed a 1960s soundtrack because there is a time traveler in your script. Perseverance paid off; you didn’t let your low budget stop you.
SPENCER: First, we went to some big name artists like Mick Jagger but we were blocked by the record companies who wanted more than we could afford. A producer friend then approached Donovan’s music publisher, showed them clips of the film where we wanted music, and they liked the clips and gave us a deal. Donovan was very kind.
KOUGUELL: South of Hope Streetwas recently picked up for distribution.
SPENCER: Buffalo8 Films is our U.S. distributor. We are planning on a Los Angeles premiere but we are waiting for the strikes to be over.
KOUGUELL: Tell me about the projects you currently have in development.
SPENCER:The Red Weather is being produced with FilmsInTuscany and The Velvet Gentleman, the story of the eccentric French composer Erik Satie, who will be played by the great French actor Jean-Hugues Anglade.
July 11, 2023 / sucity / Comments Off on Susan’s Interview with with Internationally Acclaimed Director Alice Troughton on her Debut Film ‘The Lesson’
I’ve always looked to explore genre where the female gaze has been historically excluded: Science fiction, horror, Westerns, and now film noir with this gift of a savage and subversive script capped with a dynamic female-driven twist.
Alice Troughton
In a wide-ranging discussion, I spoke with internationally acclaimed director Alice Troughton about her film The Lesson, which had its premiere at the 2023 Tribeca Film Festival. Troughton led, directed, and executive-produced Baghdad Central (2020) for C4, Troughton is also known for her work on the award-winning shows The Living and the Dead, Cucumber, Tin Star, A Discovery of Witches, and Doctor Who. In 2022 Troughton completed work on The Midwich Cuckoos for Sky.
About The Lesson: Liam, an aspiring and ambitious young writer, eagerly accepts a tutoring position at the family estate of his idol, renowned author J.M. Sinclair. But soon, Liam realizes that he is ensnared in a web of family secrets, resentment, and retribution. Sinclair, his wife Hélène, and their son Bertie all guard a dark past, one that threatens Liam’s future as well as their own.
KOUGUELL: You worked closely with producer Camille Gatin and screenwriter Alex MacKeith, as you stated, “to mine the dark corners and sultriness of the script which felt full of urgent questions: What do we do with art of monstrous men? How culpable are all parties involved in coercive control? Can we reclaim the film’s narrative from the traditional patriarchal noir archetypes? How does anyone navigate and survive the British class system?”
TROUGHTON: We didn’t want to be didactic. I’m not at all afraid of going on a polemic, but I think it’s necessary sometimes. I also think there’s always a way of catching flies with honey, making sure that the second-class status of women in the industry and in the whole world – and that includes women and women-identifying – that there is an inclusive feminism of mine; there’s nothing more important in my filmmaking than that.
KOUGUELL: This is the first feature film that you directed. Let’s talk about the transition from television to film.
TROUGHTON: First of all, I was very lucky as it was my first film experience. We all had toxic jobs and this wasn’t one. I feel that I was picked in turn by producers who wanted my vision. It all came from a show that I directed that won huge amounts of awards called Cucumber, which was by Russel T Davies, one of our finest writers.
There’s an affinity between my gaze and his; it’s just not the female gaze. We collaborated a lot of times; he’s the showrunner on Doctor Who. That experience allowed me to be free in my filmmaking, which is what my producers gave me on The Lesson. Obviously, Alex wrote this page-turner of a script. A lot of it is semi-autobiographical so it came from the heart. He’s also a complete wordsmith; his writing has his own style of acerbic wit and he’s a stand-up comic.
KOUGUELL:The Lesson is a contemporary noir that challenges the traditional definition of this genre.
TROUGHTON: We tried to subvert those norms. I think you can watch the film and have no idea about the noir archetypes. I wanted it to be just that fantastic Witness for the Prosecution rapport that you enjoy at the end of a good thriller. There’s also a meta-level of it, which you’re also subverting the traditional noir roles. If you are a noir fan and a noir filmmaker – there’s the femme fatale, the detective, the monster – those strong archetypes. We wanted to have fun with that.
KOUGUELL: Hélène’s character arc is quite an engaging slow burn.
TROUGHTON: Hélène is kind of mute. She’s not only mute around the dinner table, she’s mute in the way that the femme fatales were mute. She’s the object of desire; she’s identified through the gaze of other people, which is something obviously you’re getting into the semiotics of the gaze, something that is very noir identifying.
There is a really key and subtle moment, which is the moment that she breaks the gaze from being objectified, to returning Liam’s gaze and she looks straight at him. It is the moment that you realize that Hélène’s role is changing and that leads you to the moment to the end. She in fact is the detective. She isn’t the femme fatale. She’s playing the detective role and that always has been her role from the start.
KOUGUELL: Tell me about the shoot.
TROUGHTON: We had 22 days of shooting. It was a low budget. We needed efficiency. There was such a sense of play on that floor and joy, we all were exactly where we wanted to be to do that. There was extraordinary chemistry.
KOUGUELL: The music by Isobel Waller-Bridge was incredible and added an important layer of conflict that was referenced in the narrative.
TROUGHTON: I had heard her work on Emma and Fleabag, and when I met her we platonically fell in love. She was with the project from the very start, it was five years from the inception to the film getting made. What she’s done in the film is astonishing, it’s hugely dramatic and at the same time very subtle. The music is gorgeous and gives the film a vivacity. We were talking a lot about Russian composers like Rachmaninov, Borodin, and Tchaikovsky; they have circus and pomp and ceremony. They were great as influences.
KOUGUELL: There are other influences as well. You looked at the history of artist couples —Dorothea Tanning and Max Ernst, Lee Krasner and Jackson Pollock, Sylvia Plath and Ted Hughes – in which the male spouses and their notorious egos, garnered attention.
TROUGHTON: We looked at objectification, sexual politics, and the denigration of women in the arts to redress that balance.
KOUGUELL: The objectification of women on screen brings to mind Nina Menkes’s documentary Brainwashed: Sex-Camera-Power. The character of Hélène is watching the men and she was the one in power; she has agency.
TROUGHTON: Yes, and Hélène breaks that gaze. I watched Menkes’s film after I made The Lesson. In Brainwashed, Menkes quotes Agnes Varda: “The first feminist gesture is to say: “OK, they’re looking at me. But I’m looking at them.” The act of deciding to look, of deciding that the world is not defined by how people see me, but how I see them.”
There’s a point when we break the gaze of objectification. It is scored, but it is not scored as a big moment; it’s scored when Hélène returns the gaze, and that changes her from being objectified into the person who is doing the looking. Varda’s “I will look back at you” – that is exactly what Hélène is doing. That made me very happy when I heard that quote afterwards. It is about Hélène going: I can change the view, I can reclaim the gaze.
KOUGUELL: The theme of redemption is at the heart of The Lesson.
TROUGHTON: For me as a filmmaker, it is a particular interest of mine. I believe in redemption and I believe in a redemptive ending, and in an Aristotelian way of saying that drama is inspirational and cathartic and that you can also be inspired by redemptive endings. I like an ending with morality.
June 14, 2023 / sucity / Comments Off on Susan’s Interview with ‘The Graduates’ Filmmaker Hannah Peterson at the Tribeca Festival
Hannah Peterson generously offers insights into the development of her project from the writing and interview process to the remarkable changes that occurred in the editing room.
During the Tribeca Festival I spoke to Hannah Peterson, the writer, director and editor of her debut fiction feature The Graduates. Peterson generously offered insights into the development of her project from the writing and interview process to the remarkable changes that occurred in the editing room. Our in-depth conversation also tackled the tough subject of the aftermath of gun violence, and the decision not to portray violence on screen.
“While I was writing, I experienced a sudden personal loss when my younger brother died of gun suicide. The grief that I experienced through that loss, and the coming together of my family and community around it, became imbued into the fabric of the story and informed several of the choices I made in the edit.” – Hannah Peterson
Named one of the “25 New Faces of Independent Film” by Filmmaker Magazine, Hannah Peterson’s work has screened at Sundance Film Festival, MoMA, REDCAT, Tribeca Film Festival, and Slamdance Film Festival where she was awarded the AGBO fellowship for her short film, East of the River. She holds an MFA in Film Directing from California Institute of the Arts (CalArts) and a BA in Screen Studies from the New School. Prior to her work as a director, Hannah mentored under filmmakers Sean Baker and Chloé Zhao.
About The Graduates: A year after her boyfriend dies from gun violence, a young woman prepares to graduate high school as she navigates an uncertain future alongside a community that is searching for ways to heal.
KOUGUELL: From the inception of the script to the final cut, you were in a unique position as the writer, director, and editor, to convey the story you wanted to tell. This is an auteur film in the best sense of the definition. Tell me about the process.
PETERSON: When I set out to make The Graduates, I was interested in telling a contemporary story, a coming-of-age story in the American public school system. I set about interviewing high schoolers and recent graduates, and asked about their experiences, their fears, and the highs and lows of high school.
This is something I explored in my short films prior and wanted to explore in a feature. Nearly everyone I spoke to mentioned their anxiety about safety in their school and that on any given day something could happen. I was very struck by that. I couldn’t tell a contemporary story without touching upon that throughline. I wanted to explore what it was like when the cameras left and the resources left, and how it was really a community left to navigate the circumstances.
In terms of the script, I was writing it as a vehicle for me to direct. I always see the script as a more malleable instrument. There were scenes that I knew I wanted to cast real people in or cast locally. For instance, the grief circle and the basketball team. I knew in advance before we went into production I wanted those to be real people, actual high schoolers, sharing their actual stories, their actual hopes and dreams. I was leaving space for those moments to be happening organically, and the rest to be scripted.
In the process of production things obviously changed as they do. As you mentioned, to be the editor, I had a new and added perspective. I certainly did a lot of rewriting in the edit of the film. The script was originally structured in chapters, Chapter 1 was Genevieve, Chapter 2 was Ben, and Chapter 3 was Jon. It worked so well on paper and I had great responses to the script and we shot it that way, but it wasn’t until the editing room – it might be a testament to the performances all being so powerful – but I knew we had to be with all these characters from the start to finish of the film. Of course, this required some pulling from Act 3 to Act 1, and reordering a lot of things and that was really an activity of discovery. I really found the film when I made that decision to do that.
KOUGUELL: You just mentioned about the interviews you had with actual high schoolers. Please elaborate about that process.
PETERSON: I was lucky to learn about writing and directing from Chloé Zhao and Sean Baker. Both of them spend a lot of time on locations where they will be filming and speaking with individuals who are living the experience of the characters. That creates a fluidity between the screenwriting process and the casting and location processes; that was something that was influential in all my work.
On this feature, I set up as a writer to be a listener. The students who I interviewed were just any students who were willing to speak to me. I actually saw a photojournalism article in the New York Times called “Inside Santa Monica High”. There were these candid photos taken by Nico Young, who was a junior at the time. I was so moved by the photographs. I reached out to Nico and asked him to meet the subjects of his photographs. In my interviews, I asked students what high school is like. The students shared their journal entries and told me private moments in their lives, and through those conversations, I got to hear about their anxieties and about safety in their schools. That became the most substantive part of these conversations.
KOUGUELL: There is no antagonist, except for the gunman who remains unnamed and unseen on screen. This was a powerful choice not to give attention to him, which is often the case in the media.
PETERSON: I think the first and easiest choice I made was not to show the act of violence itself. This created a lot of creative challenges because you’re basically skipping over the inciting incident of all these people’s lives. When you’re talking about trauma and grief, they’re not actually linear experiences and when you’re in that situation, the world is antagonistic. You don’t necessarily need massive conflict in every scene because your life is conflicted. I really decided to trust in that and in the characters and situate the plot around these private moments of grieving rather than on traditional plot points or inciting incidents.
KOUGUELL: You mentioned this feeling of agency that your main characters had, and how they are on that journey to find that. There were also moments of levity that were important and not only drove the narrative forward, it made the drama that much more impactful and moving.
PETERSON: It’s always really important when talking about things as heavy as death, grief, and trauma, to lever that with moments of levity. When you’re spending time with young people it’s inevitable because people don’t always talk about what they’re feeling all the time. A lot of it is underneath; a lot of it is mundane, just natural levity in the way young people express themselves, especially in the privacy of each other’s company that I wanted to make sure was part of the fabric of this film.
KOUGUELL: You allowed the characters to breathe in the film and spend time with them, not cutting away from them too quickly. This is such a difficult subject matter and I imagine with the whole process of treading that fine line, questioning: is it too much, is it too little? How did you find that balance?
PETERSON: I cared so much about the characters and cared about the actors. Each character was emblematic of a multitude of conversations I had along the way about survivors with high schoolers and with youth. It was so important for me to be able to do those people justice and to honor them.
When I was editing it, thinking about the frame and the camera, I wanted it to feel like I was there with the characters and I didn’t want to leave them until they were ready to be alone. It drives the rhythm of the script. In the moment that a character could be strong for a minute, we can go to someone else, and when that person needs someone to be there we can go there as audience members.
KOUGUELL: The film concludes on a hopeful note without feeling contrived or tied up in a neat bow.
PETERSON: I’m really glad you got that. I wanted people to take from the film the conversations I had with survivors during the writing process. Throughout the conversations I was moved by the sense of agency and urgency and altruism and that while this generation was rooted in grief, I found it really hopeful. In the film there are no grand gestures; there is a subtle rebuilding of a sense of self that really comes when each character starts to turn towards each other. For me, there is so much hope in that.
I hope that this film provides a safe space for people to process feelings about gun violence in our country that can exist outside of the reactive cycle of the news media and to connect with one another, because I believe that connection and conversation can be the precursors for action.